Model Hybrid Project-Based Learning dan AI-Assisted Coding untuk Kompetensi Pemrograman Mahasiswa

Nurita Pratiwi; Suliyanah Masithoh; Nuryani Cahyani

doi:10.69688/jpip.v4i2.212

Authors

Nurita Pratiwi STKIP Jaya Pura
Suliyanah Masithoh STKIP Jaya Pura
Nuryani Cahyani Universitas Dharma Kencana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69688/jpip.v4i2.212

Keywords:

AI-assisted coding, Kompetensi Pemrograman, Mahasiswa, Project-Based Learning, Pendidikan Pemrograman

Abstract

Kompetensi pemrograman mahasiswa mencakup pemahaman konsep, perancangan algoritme, implementasi kode, pengujian, debugging, dan kemampuan menjelaskan solusi. Kehadiran Generative AI dan AI-Assisted Coding memberikan peluang dukungan adaptif dalam proses pemrograman, tetapi penggunaan yang tidak terstruktur dapat mendorong penerimaan kode secara pasif tanpa pemahaman yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji efektivitas model hybrid Project-Based Learning (PjBL) dan AI-Assisted Coding dalam meningkatkan kompetensi pemrograman mahasiswa. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group. Sebanyak 132 mahasiswa terlibat, terdiri atas kelompok eksperimen (n = 66) dan kelompok kontrol (n = 66). Model hybrid terdiri atas lima tahap, yaitu analisis masalah, desain proyek, AI-assisted coding, pengujian dan debugging, serta refleksi. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes kompetensi pemrograman, tugas kinerja, dan lembar validasi model, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif, uji t berpasangan, uji t independen, N-gain, dan Cohen’s d. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata kelompok eksperimen meningkat dari 60,89 menjadi 82,39, sedangkan kelompok kontrol meningkat dari 60,77 menjadi 70,20. Perbedaan posttest antarkelompok signifikan (t = 7,229; p < 0,001) dengan ukuran efek besar (d = 1,258). Temuan menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan AI sebagai scaffolding untuk menjelaskan, mengevaluasi, menguji, dan memperbaiki kode dapat mendukung peningkatan kompetensi pemrograman ketika mahasiswa tetap bertanggung jawab atas analisis masalah, keputusan teknis, dan refleksi.

References

[1] U. Ubaidah and M. Loeis, “Improving computer programming competency for first semester computer science students through immersive project-based learning,” J. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 179–189, 2022, doi: 10.5590/JERAP.2022.12.1.13.

[2] L. Zhang and Y. Ma, “A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, p. 1202728, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728.

[3] R. A. Jabbar and N. D. A. Halim, “The impact of project-based learning through integrating the use of technology in computer science courses on students’ acquisition of programming skills,” Innov. Teach. Learn. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.11113/itlj.v8.152.

[4] E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 103, p. 102274, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

[5] C. K. Lo, “What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 410, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.

[6] A. Tlili et al., “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, p. 15, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.

[7] U.N.E.S.C.O., Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO, 2023.

[8] R. Yilmaz and F. G. K. Yilmaz, “The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, p. 100147, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147.

[9] D. Sun, A. Boudouaia, C. Zhu, and Y. Li, “Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students’ programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, p. 14, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00446-5.

[10] S. Groothuijsen, A. A. J. Beemt, J. C. Remmers, and L. W. Meeuwen, “AI chatbots in programming education: Students’ use in a scientific computing course and consequences for learning,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, p. 100290, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100290.

[11] T. Kosar, D. Ostojić, Y. D. Liu, and M. Mernik, “Computer science education in ChatGPT era: Experiences from an experiment in a programming course for novice programmers,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 629, 2024, doi: 10.3390/math12050629.

[12] A. C. M. Yang, J.-Y. Lin, C.-Y. Lin, and H. Ogata, “Enhancing Python learning with PyTutor: Efficacy of a ChatGPT-based intelligent tutoring system in programming education,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, p. 100309, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100309.

[13] R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998, doi: 10.1119/1.18809.

[14] C. K. Y. Chan, “A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, p. 38, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3.

[15] M. Hornberger, A. Bewersdorff, and C. Nerdel, “What do university students know about artificial intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy test,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, p. 100165, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165.

[16] D. T. K. Ng, J. K. L. Leung, S. K. W. Chu, and M. S. Qiao, “Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 2, p. 100041, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041.

[17] Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy,” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 71, p. 102642, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.